Analisis umpan balik tertulis guru pada tulisan siswa dalam teks recount
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v19i3.22336Keywords:
menulis, recount text, umpan balik tertulisAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti jenis feedback tertulis yang diberikan oleh guru pada tulisan siswa sekolah menengah atas kelas sepuluh di SMAN 1 Sukatani tahun pelajaran 2019/2020. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah dokumen analisis untuk meneliti jenis feedback tertulis yang diberikan oleh guru bahasa Inggris pada hasil tulisan siswa kelas sepuluh jurusan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA). Temuan mengungkapkan bahwa kedua guru menggunakan feedback tertulis yang berbeda pada tulisan siswa. Guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPA cenderung menggunakan feedback tertulis langsung dan guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPS menggunakan jenis feedback tidak langsung. Dapat disimpulkan alasan perbedaan jenis feedback tertulis yang digunakan karena guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPA berpendapat bahwa feedback langsung lebih rinci dan lebih cepat dipahami siswa. Sedangkan guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPS berpendapat bahwa dengan memberikan feedback tertulis tidak langsung dapat mendorong siswa untuk berpikir dan membuat siswa memiliki keingintahuan yang lebih tentang kesalahan yang mereka tulis dan siswa bisa menanyakannya ke guru.
References
Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text types in English. Macmillan Education Australia.
Chen, Y. S., & Su, S. W. (2012). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal, 66(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr061
Ellis, R. (2008a). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2008b). Principles of instructed language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 1(1), 1–16.
Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan genre based dalam pengajaran bahasa Inggris. Rizqi Press.
Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Ferris, D., Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2012). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (2nd ed., pp. 81–104). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524742.007
Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000250
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2004). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611505
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Longman.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Jalaluddin, I., Md. Yunus, M., & Yamat, H. (2011). Improving Malaysian rural learners’ writing skill: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.013
Jarvis, D. J. (2002). The process writing method. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(7), 1–10. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Jarvis-Writing.html
Lewis, M. (2002). Giving feedback in language classes. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Martin, J. R. (1985). Language, register and genre. Children Writing: A Reader, 1(1), 21–29.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill/Contemporary.
Poudel, A. P. (2018). Academic writing: Coherence and cohesion in paragraphs. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 1(1), 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322537095_Academic_Writing_Coherence_and_Cohesion_in_Paragraph
Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Prentice Hall Regents.
Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667152
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., Hull, J. C., & Proctor, S. (1990). Interchange: English for international communication. Cambridge University Press.
Wahlström, M. (2014). Effects of direct and indirect feedback on ESL/EFL writing: A literature review focusing on form. University of Gothenburg.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Sri Widarsih, Didi Suherdi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
