Teacher professional development in developing English assessments through TPACK

Authors

  • Fauris Zuhri Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v22i2.48687

Keywords:

content knowledge, english assessments development, technological pedagogical, teacher professional development

Abstract

Exploring teacher professional development requires two main teaching factors in the digital era. They are internal factors and external. In internal, the teacher plays an essential role in developing professionalism in teaching. In shallow, it is teaching instruments – lesson plans. The appropriate English teacher and lesson plan development contribute significantly to teaching achievement. Therefore, this study explores how English teachers implement technological pedagogical and content knowledge to improve their English instructional assessments in teacher professional development. Implementing technological pedagogical and content knowledge in teacher professional development can gradually enhance their English instructional evaluations. They have different language competence backgrounds by progressively implementing technological pedagogical and content knowledge in teacher professional development. Still, they can improve their English instructional assessments. The study uses a survey: a questionnaire, interviews, and observation are applied to find the data. The subjects are English teachers who joined teacher professional development in Surabaya 2020. The research results showed that implementing technological pedagogical and content knowledge can improve English instructional assessments in teacher professional development. Three factors contribute to integrating English instructional assessment with technological pedagogical and content knowledge. English teachers are more comfortable making English instructional assessments, alternative instructional English evaluations are available, and improved English instructional reviews. Therefore, English instructional evaluations are more exciting and challenging. Thus, integrating English instructional assessments with technological pedagogical and content knowledge in teacher professional development is crucial in improving teaching English in Indonesia.

References

Bakar, N. S. A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher's self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259–276.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595–603.

Gholson, M. L., & Guzman-Orth, D. (2019). Developing an alternate English language proficiency assessment system: A theory of action. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1–19.

Kimura, Y., Nakata, Y., Ikeno, O., Naganuma, N., & Andrews, S. (2017). Developing classroom language assessment benchmarks for Japanese teachers of English as a foreign language. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 1–14.

Mulyadi, D., Wijayatingsih, T., Budiastuti, R., Ifadah, M., & Aimah, S. (2020). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge of ESP teachers in blended learning format. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 124–139.

Sojanah, J., Suwatno, Kodri, K., & Machmud, A. (2021). Factors affecting teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (A survey on economics teacher knowledge). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 1–16.

The Regulation of Minister of Education and Culture No. 81 A, Appendix IV – Implementation of Curriculum as Teaching-Learning Guidance. (2013).

Twining, P., Raffaghelli, J., Albion, P., & Knezek, D. (2013). Moving education into the digital age: The contribution of teachers' professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 426–437.

Published

2022-08-26

How to Cite

Zuhri, F. (2022). Teacher professional development in developing English assessments through TPACK. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 22(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v22i2.48687