Author Guidelines

Indonesian Review of Community Service welcomes original community-service manuscripts written in Bahasa Indonesia or English. All submissions must be consistent with the journal’s scope and focus on current, SDG-related community-service issues (see About / Focus and Scope). Manuscripts that fall outside the journal’s scope may be returned without review.


1. Language and Basic Format

  • Manuscripts may be written in Bahasa Indonesia or English.
  • The title, abstract, and keywords must be in English and reflect the content of the article accurately.
  • Manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) with standard A4 paper size, 12-pt font, and double spacing.
  • The total length of the manuscript should be between 4,000 and 6,000 words, excluding references, tables, and figures.

2. Manuscript Structure

Manuscripts should follow this structure:

Introduction

Present the background, problem statement, and significance of the community-service activity. Explain the gap in practice or research that the service addresses and state the objectives or expected outcomes.

Literature Review (Optional)

Provide a concise review of relevant theories, concepts, or previous community-service studies that support the design and rationale of the intervention.

Methodology (Pre-, During-, Post-Community Service)

The methodology section should clearly describe:

  • Design of the service: type of intervention (e.g., training, socialization, mentoring, social engineering, empowerment program).
  • Site and participants: location of the community, target group, and selection criteria (e.g., number of beneficiaries, roles, vulnerabilities).
  • Pre-service: preparation stage (identification of needs, planning, collaboration partners, timeline, resources).
  • Service implementation: description of activities, timeline, and roles of lecturers, students, and community members.
  • Post-service: follow-up activities, monitoring, and evaluation.
  • Method of data collection: techniques used (e.g., observation, interviews, focus groups, surveys, documentation).
  • Data analysis: how data were analyzed, including qualitative (e.g., thematic analysis) or quantitative (e.g., descriptive statistics) approaches.

Findings and Discussion

  • Present the main results of the community-service activity, supported by tables, figures, or short narratives where appropriate.
  • Interpret the findings in relation to the objectives, earlier literature, and the SDG-related context (if applicable).
  • Discuss strengths, limitations, and unexpected outcomes of the service.

Conclusion

  • Summarize the key achievements and implications of the service for the community and for future practice or policy.
  • Suggest directions for follow-up or replicability in similar contexts.

3. Citation and Referencing (APA-7)

  • All in-text citations and the reference list must follow APA citation style (7th edition).
  • Use author–date in-text citations (e.g., Smith, 2020; Smith & Lee, 2021).
  • References should be presented in alphabetical order by the author’s last name.
  • Only sources that are cited in the text should appear in the reference list.
  • Include a full reference list at the end of the manuscript, formatted according to APA-7 (e.g., journal articles, books, reports, websites).
  • It is strongly recommended to use a reference manager tool (e.g., Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote) to ensure consistent formatting.

4. Ethical and Administrative Requirements

  • Authors must ensure that the manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere or is not under consideration by another journal.
  • Manuscripts must fit within the scope of the journal, specifically community-service projects that address current, context-relevant issues and show explicit or implicit relevance to the Sustainable Development Goals.
  • If the service involves human participants, authors should confirm that ethical considerations (informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality) have been observed.
  • All authors listed must have contributed meaningfully to the manuscript and endorse the final version of the article.